Independent authorization for consequential AI actions

AI can take action. BeaconGuard decides if it should.

BeaconGuard checks the exact consequential action an AI or agent is attempting before execution. If it is not authorized, it does not happen.

See the Product Request Evaluation
AI or agent proposes a consequential action. BeaconGuard independently authorizes the exact action. ALLOW can issue one-time execution authority; DENY issues no execution authority. Verifiable evidence records the exact action and governing authority.
Identity, delegation, and governing policy provide authorization context. BeaconGuard separately decides whether the exact consequential action may execute.

THE CONTROL GAP

Access is not authority

Identity, delegation, and tool access establish reachability and context. BeaconGuard makes a separate authorization decision on the business consequence itself.

Request ALLOW does not equal Action ALLOW.

WHY BEACONGUARD

Authorize the action. Prove the decision.

Action-level authority

Permission to use a tool does not mean permission to perform every action it can trigger. BeaconGuard authorizes the specific action before execution.

Verified authority

Only approved and verified customer controls can govern production authorization.

Verifiable evidence

Each decision preserves the action and governing authority needed for later verification.

2-MINUTE OVERVIEW

See the operating model

INDUSTRIES

Same authorization boundary. Different consequences.

Healthcare

Patient communications, scheduling actions, and operational record changes.

Healthcare

Financial services

Case actions, customer communications, and account or workflow side effects.

Financial services

CONTROLLED EVALUATION

Start with one consequential workflow

Evaluate boundary placement, exact-action controls, evidence, and deployment fit without replacing existing systems of record.

Request Evaluation Review Assurance